遗漏未在题干中出现，反而藏在问题中的限定

不少考生在审题时，只盯着题干，反而漏掉了躲藏在问题中的限定条件。

请大家看这道题：

In some countries, museums charge people for admission, while in some other countries, people are admitted into museums free of charge. Do you think the advantages of charging admission outweigh its disadvantages?

同样，我们再看下一题：

Some high school graduates go travelling or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university. Do you think this has more advantages or disadvantages to their study?

有人拿到这道题目后开心到飞起，私以为gap year这种老生常谈的话题观点自己早就成竹在胸了。但是，请直奔问题的最后，找到“to their study”的限定，这意味我们brainstorm出的观点只能是graduates’ studies的相关，诸如“练就独立”、“拓展人脉”的观点必然是跑题的。

未挖掘出表层信息背后的限定

我们直接上题，请看：

More and more adults live with their parents after they have finished the education and been employed. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?

希望今天的分享能有效帮助大家避免类似的错误。更多关于审题的技巧和经验欢迎大家关注宁波新航道官网进行了解。